4,396
edits
009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
(Created page with "{{Entry |Entry number=009 |Book=No |Web=Yes |Year=2022 |People=Nathan Allen Jones |Title=Glitch Poetry |Link=http://www.openhumanitiespress.org/books/titles/glitch-poetics/ |Type=Book |Has URL=Yes |Has PDF=Yes |Description=Glitches are errors where the digital bursts or creeps into our everyday lives as fragmented image, garbled text and aberrant event. Today, when computational technology is integrated ever more closely into bodies and social structures, glitches are co...") |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Based on a range of close readings of contemporary literature by writers including Linda Stupart, Sam Riviere, Keston Sutherland, Ben Lerner, Caroline Bergvall, Erica Scourti, David Peace and the internet novelists, and drawing on theories of error, shock, glitch, critical posthumanism and code, Jones lays the groundwork for writing that can productively engage in the new situation for literature in the context of AI, the Anthropocene and the post-digital age. His book articulates the working of error in literary and media practice at the horizon of human and machine language. | Based on a range of close readings of contemporary literature by writers including Linda Stupart, Sam Riviere, Keston Sutherland, Ben Lerner, Caroline Bergvall, Erica Scourti, David Peace and the internet novelists, and drawing on theories of error, shock, glitch, critical posthumanism and code, Jones lays the groundwork for writing that can productively engage in the new situation for literature in the context of AI, the Anthropocene and the post-digital age. His book articulates the working of error in literary and media practice at the horizon of human and machine language. | ||
<br> | |||
Glitch Poetics resists technofuturism, reinventing errancy as a necessary aesthetic value of (and crucially against) our time. | Glitch Poetics resists technofuturism, reinventing errancy as a necessary aesthetic value of (and crucially against) our time. | ||
}} | }} | ||