4,351
edits
009: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
No edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Based on a range of close readings of contemporary literature by writers including Linda Stupart, Sam Riviere, Keston Sutherland, Ben Lerner, Caroline Bergvall, Erica Scourti, David Peace and the internet novelists, and drawing on theories of error, shock, glitch, critical posthumanism and code, Jones lays the groundwork for writing that can productively engage in the new situation for literature in the context of AI, the Anthropocene and the post-digital age. His book articulates the working of error in literary and media practice at the horizon of human and machine language. | Based on a range of close readings of contemporary literature by writers including Linda Stupart, Sam Riviere, Keston Sutherland, Ben Lerner, Caroline Bergvall, Erica Scourti, David Peace and the internet novelists, and drawing on theories of error, shock, glitch, critical posthumanism and code, Jones lays the groundwork for writing that can productively engage in the new situation for literature in the context of AI, the Anthropocene and the post-digital age. His book articulates the working of error in literary and media practice at the horizon of human and machine language. | ||
Glitch Poetics resists technofuturism, reinventing errancy as a necessary aesthetic value of (and crucially against) our time. | Glitch Poetics resists technofuturism, reinventing errancy as a necessary aesthetic value of (and crucially against) our time. | ||
}} | }} | ||